General Summary #

The meeting focused heavily on the procedural conflict surrounding City Manager Mike Womack's performance review. Mr. Womack expressed concerns that the board was changing his job description and evaluation rules at the last minute, violating his contract 0:23. Tensions rose between Mayor Jeramy Hing and Commissioner Joshua C. Atwood over the legality of certain motions and the transparency of discussions involving the city attorney.

The commission spent significant time debating the appropriate date for the review to ensure compliance with the 30-day window following the delivery of evaluation documents. After a failed motion and a brief recess, the commission settled on a special meeting for July 20th at 4:00 p.m. The meeting also touched upon legal counsel issues involving Bodman PLC and ended with highly critical public comments regarding the leadership and atmosphere of the commission.

Key Topics #

  • City Manager Performance Evaluation scheduling and contractual compliance
  • Legal counsel (Bodman PLC) reporting and written opinions
  • Allegations of contract violations and lack of direction
  • Commission decorum and leadership style

Who #

  • Jeramy Hing: Mayor
  • Mike Womack: City Manager
  • Joshua C. Atwood: Commissioner
  • Stefan Brady: Commissioner
  • Linda Glisman: Commissioner
  • Melissa Petrie: Commissioner / Mayor Pro-Tem
  • Lynne McCarthy: Commissioner
  • Mr. Francis: City Attorney

What #

  • Performance Review Scheduling: The primary conflict involved determining when the City Manager's evaluation could occur. Mr. Womack requested 30 days to review documents 0:44. An initial motion to set the date for June 1st failed due to procedural disputes 5:39.
  • Legal Opinion Request: Commissioner Atwood made a motion for Bodman PLC to provide a written legal opinion on or by May 31st, 2026 1:04:35. The motion was intended to provide clarity for future decision-making.
  • Reappointment: The commission addressed the reappointment of Mr. Womack to the Lair Building Authority 1:25:27.

When #

  • June 1, 2026: An initial proposed date for the evaluation (rejected) 5:39.
  • June 18, 2026: A proposed date for the evaluation (discussed) 13:26.
  • July 6, 2026: An initially proposed special meeting date 23:45.
  • July 20, 2026 at 4:00 p.m.: The finalized date and time for the special meeting to conduct the performance review 57:21.
  • May 31, 2026: Proposed deadline for the Bodman PLC written opinion 1:05:02.

Why #

  • Contractual Compliance: The debate over the date was driven by the need to adhere to the 30-day window in Mr. Womack's contract 11:10.
  • Conflict of Interest/Authority: Commissioner Atwood and Mayor Hing argued over whether individual commissioners had the authority to direct the City Manager or if directions must only come through formal motions 2:09.
  • Transparency vs. Confidentiality: There was a debate regarding whether the legal work of Bodman PLC should be subject to a strict deadline and how much information should be shared with the commission 1:08:25.

Votes/Decisions #

  • Motion to postpone the review to June 1st:
    • Result: Fails 9:42.
    • Roll Call: Commissioner Brady (Yes), Commissioner Glisman (Yes), Commissioner McCarthy (Yes), Commissioner Petrie (Yes), Commissioner Atwood (Yes). Note: The motion failed after members rescinded/changed votes during the procedure.
  • Motion to postpone the review to July 20th at 4:00 p.m. (to allow 30-day review period):
    • Made by: Commissioner McCarthy
    • Seconded by: Commissioner Glisman
    • Result: Carries 59:17.
    • Roll Call: Commissioner McCarthy (No), Commissioner Petrie (No), Commissioner Atwood (Yes), Commissioner Brady (Yes), Commissioner Glisman (Yes).
  • Motion for Bodman PLC to provide a written legal opinion by May 31st:
    • Made by: Commissioner Atwood
    • Seconded by: Commissioner Brady
    • Result: Fails 12:40.
    • Roll Call: Commissioner McCarthy (No), Commissioner Petrie (No), Commissioner Atwood (Yes), Commissioner Brady (Yes), Commissioner Glisman (No).
  • Motion to reappoint Mr. Womack to the Lair Building Authority:
    • Made by: Commissioner McCarthy
    • Seconded by: Commissioner Glisman
    • Result: Carries 1:25:48.
    • Roll Call: All in favor.

Action Items #

  • Special Meeting: The Commission is scheduled to meet on July 20, 2026, at 4:00 p.m. for the City Manager's performance evaluation 57:21.
  • Legal Follow-up: Coordination with Bodman PLC regarding the status of the written report 1:20:23.

Comments Summary #

Overall Sentiment

The overall sentiment is highly negative, frustrated, and critical. Viewers expressed significant alarm regarding the conduct of the Mayor and the perceived dysfunction within the City Commission, describing the environment as chaotic and divisive.

Recurring Themes

  • Mayor Hing's Leadership Style: Frequent accusations that the Mayor is acting like a "tyrant" or "judge," exhibiting power-grabbing tendencies and a desire for control.
  • Disrespect and Double Standards: Concerns regarding biased enforcement of meeting rules, specifically that certain commissioners are allowed to speak out of turn while others are shut down.
  • Conflict with City Management: Speculation and criticism regarding the relationship between the Mayor and City Manager Mike Womack.
  • Commission Dysfunction: Observations of unprofessional behavior, including physical gestures of disrespect and a lack of cooperation among members.

Notable Comments

"Hing shuts down everyone that doesn’t digest it his way. He interrupts. He dismisses each of you. Some of the women are mirroring his behavior." — @KO_TransparencyMatters, 0 likes

"Whats crazy is how much hing lets the women all talk out of turn... yet as soon as Brady talks hes out of order." — @shawnschalau4396, 4 likes

"If anyone believes that King Hing is not gunning for Mr Womack's job they are delusional." — @kellynolan6437, 4 likes

"Lapeer you handed a narcissistic personality the gavel and he took control to another level, so this is what you get!" — @KO_TransparencyMatters, 0 likes

Dissent / Disagreement

While the comments are overwhelmingly critical of the Mayor, some viewers noted a double standard where certain female commissioners appear to mirror the Mayor's behavior, while others expressed frustration with the repetitive use of "out of order" rulings.

Chat Summary #

Overall Sentiment

The audience sentiment is overwhelmingly critical, hostile, and disillusioned. Viewers frequently expressed frustration with Mayor Hing's leadership style, accusing him of being undemocratic, biased, and unprofessional. There is a strong sense of tension regarding the relationship between the Mayor and City Manager Mike Womack, with many commenters expressing support for Womack while calling for the potential recall of certain commissioners.

Chat Timeline

[00:00 – 30:00] The chat reacts to early procedural tensions. Viewers criticize Mayor Hing's conduct, specifically his treatment of Womack and his perceived authority. Discussions emerge regarding gender dynamics on the commission and accusations of certain members talking out of order.

[30:01 – 60:00] The conversation shifts toward the roles and allegiances of city officials. Viewers debate the involvement of the clerk in the City Manager's evaluation and question whether officials are following proper protocols.

[60:01 – 90:00] Discussions turn to administrative details, such as compensation and the legalities of attorney-client privilege. The chat expresses skepticism regarding the commission's motives and the potential for legal repercussions regarding Womack's employment.

[90:01 – 122:15] The final segment is dominated by talk of legal standing, free speech, and the possibility of a recall. Viewers speculate on the feasibility of removing officials from office and discuss the political fallout of the meeting's events.

Notable Messages

23:02 "this mayor is a joke" — @mundanethings8515

"This mayor is a total joke! Ditto for Petrie! smh...Both better enjoy their remaining term, as our community wont make back to back mistakes with both! sickening" — @waynebarnier

42:31 "rules for thee, not for me!" — @mundanethings8515

1:36:10 "you done messed up on this one mayor - do some homework" — @mundanethings8515

[102:49] "The word recall I am hearing more often." — @williamporter1193

Community Sentiment on Key Moments

  • Mayor's Conduct: A significant portion of the chat viewed the Mayor's actions as overstepping authority and being hypocritical toward other commissioners.
  • Womack vs. The Commission: There was a clear divide in the chat, with many viewers defending Womack's professionalism while accusing the commission of having a hidden agenda against him.
  • Procedural Integrity: Many comments focused on the "out of order" nature of the meeting, specifically regarding how certain members were permitted to speak or whisper.